
Introduction
A participatory forum is a space—online, offline, or hybrid—where citizens, stakeholders, and institutions co-produce knowledge and decisions. When well designed, it improves policy quality, trust, and legitimacy. This hands-on guide covers planning, facilitation, tools, and evaluation, with links to useful resources.
👉 Related reads: How to effectively moderate online debates, Online tools for organizing virtual assemblies, The principles of collaborative democracy.
1) Define purpose, scope, and expected outcomes
Clarify the purpose (e.g., draft a regulation, co-design a mobility plan) and deliverables (guidelines, recommendations, ranked priorities). Set the decision boundaries and how outputs will be used.
2) Map stakeholders and the community
Identify key groups (residents, associations, businesses, public bodies, schools) and their interests. Plan actions to include underrepresented groups (youth, seniors, newcomers). Good mapping reduces conflict and improves deliberation quality.
3) Choose the format (online/offline/hybrid)
- Offline: thematic tables, world café, neighborhood walks.
- Online: deliberative platforms and video conferences.
- Hybrid: combines accessibility and rich dialogue.
4) Recommended digital tools
- Participation platforms: Decidim for proposals & voting; Concorder for verifiable voting, decisions, minutes, and audit trails.
- Video conferencing: Zoom/Teams/Meet for plenaries and breakout rooms.
- Identity & signatures: see Digital ID and e-signatures for legal validity.
5) Agenda, rules, and materials
Publish a realistic agenda (objectives, timings, outputs) and a code of conduct (turn-taking, respectful language, evidence). Prepare neutral materials (briefs, data, maps) to support informed deliberation.
6) Roles and facilitation
- Process owner for governance and follow-up.
- Facilitators/moderators to ensure balanced participation and synthesis.
- Stakeholders engaged transparently.
- Secretariat for minutes, reports, and publication.
👉 Useful guide: How to effectively moderate online debates
7) Inclusion and accessibility
Offer convenient times, childcare or reimbursements, captioning/sign language, and digital tutorials. In online/hybrid formats enable moderated chat, hand-raise, polls, and anonymous Q&A.
8) Voting and traceability
For binding outcomes, use e-voting with strong authentication and verifiable logs, as outlined in the Checklist for organizing a secure online vote. Platforms like Concorder provide public audit trails and exportable minutes.
9) Evaluation and follow-up
Publish clear reports (what was decided, who does what, by when) and KPIs: participation (count, % newcomers), discussion quality, implementation rate, time/costs. Keep the community engaged with regular updates.
10) Quick examples
- Barcelona (Decidim): thousands of proposals and neighborhood projects implemented; strong transparency throughout the cycle.
- Bologna (Urban commons): collaboration pacts to maintain and co-manage public spaces.
- Taiwan (vTaiwan): multi-stakeholder agreements on complex policies via online deliberation.


