Category Civic Participation

Participatory budgeting: a digital toolkit from ideas to delivery

Bilancio partecipativo toolkit digitale dalla raccolta idee alla consegna 4

Participatory budgeting works when residents can see trade‑offs, track proposals and verify delivery. This digital toolkit covers eligibility, idea intake, clustering, cost verification, voting and post‑vote tracking. We include accessibility tips, anti‑fraud safeguards and guidance to publish datasets/APIs for civic monitoring. A sample calendar and lightweight RACI align teams across departments and vendors, turning one‑off votes into ongoing collaboration.

Airport expansions and regional planning: a participatory approach (Florence–Pisa)

aeroporto – governance partecipata – Piana

Expanding airports means long‑term choices on accessibility, noise, land use and regional governance—the Florence–Pisa system is a telling case. We compare scenarios and suggest an inter‑municipal governance to decide on mitigations and benefit‑sharing. The guide helps evaluate alternatives with territorial coherence, robust evidence and time‑bound commitments. The guide details institutional and civic roles, evidence handling, tools to safeguard fairness and transparency, and how to translate outcomes into time‑bound, enforceable conditions. It includes examples, call and agenda templates, minutes models, operational checklists and quality indicators, plus guidance for clear communication, transparent timelines and the inclusion of vulnerable groups. Based on the Concorder proposal: airport expansions and regional planning a participatory approach florence pisa.

Stadium redevelopment and public value: a participatory decision framework (Milan case)

San Siro come scegliere tra nuovo stadio e rigenerazione con un percorso partecipativo credibile

Deciding on stadium futures requires a public assessment of alternatives, costs and benefits, heritage safeguards and construction impacts. We provide a method to weigh demolition, conservation and redevelopment scenarios with public criteria and collective‑value indicators. The framework integrates community benefits and business support, accessibility, non‑sport uses and protection of the Meazza’s civic memory. The guide details institutional and civic roles, evidence handling, tools to safeguard fairness and transparency, and how to translate outcomes into time‑bound, enforceable conditions. It includes examples, call and agenda templates, minutes models, operational checklists and quality indicators, plus guidance for clear communication, transparent timelines and the inclusion of vulnerable groups. Based on the Concorder proposal: stadium redevelopment and public value a participatory decision framework milan case.

Santa Palomba waste-to-energy: designing a fair public inquiry

Santa Palomba

A credible public inquiry on Rome’s Santa Palomba plant needs a shared purpose, a clear scope and transparent ground rules. We propose a four‑phase sequence—preparation, listening, public debate, and delivery—with realistic tools and timelines. Special focus is given to air and water impacts, road and rail logistics, the actor map and the prioritization of mitigations and trade‑offs. The guide details institutional and civic roles, evidence handling, tools to safeguard fairness and transparency, and how to translate outcomes into time‑bound, enforceable conditions. It includes examples, call and agenda templates, minutes models, operational checklists and quality indicators, plus guidance for clear communication, transparent timelines and the inclusion of vulnerable groups. Based on the Concorder proposal: santa palomba waste to energy designing a fair public inquiry.